Expert-/heuristic evaluation debriefing

In the following we elaborate on the steps and measures we took in order to incorporate the feedback, which we received during the expert-evaluation.

Questions

1) Omitted: due to the fact that our design is not subject to budget restriction and as we strongly believe that an implementation of the system at a reasonable-price is feasible.
2) Incorporated: we already thought of security concerns regarding the panels before, and decided to use safety glass plates instead of touch screens.
3) Incorporated: in favour of our target group we decided that playing the game as a couple is sufficient.
4) Incorporated: we converted the touch screen into a big panel "button", as suggested.
5) Omitted:  we decided against levels.
6) Incorporated: after the feedback we defined 30s. as the time for one round and tried it out during the user testing, which turned out to be sufficient.
7) Omitted: we could not identify any suitable use case for a moving floor.
8) Incorporated: we added an introduction (i.e.; a voice recording) at the beginning of the game.
9) Incorporated: we added voice feedback (e.g.; "perfect, nästa", "rätt", "fel", ...)
10) Considered: a handicapped person will need assistance from an adult.
11) Incorporated: we did, a rope from the top not make a final decision how the monkey climbs the tree.
12) Omitted: dependent on question no. 11, and we decided against the monkey falling of the tree at the end. 

Suggestions

All suggestions were directly incorporated into our design and prototype.